NEW ERA DIARY

AGING AUTHENTICALLY
May 20, 2023

I was shocked and not a little bit unnerved at my first glance of the latest cover of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit 2023 Edition. It has a picture of Martha Stewart, at the age of 81, clad in a bikini top that plunges in front displaying the better parts of her equally aged breasts represented by the magazine editors as “celebrating an aging woman”. The problem is that the woman does not reveal decades of graceful aging rather an air-brushed photo of a woman enhanced by years and surely millions of dollars of surgical touch-up to her face and body. She appears to me a virtual reality of herself. This is Martha Stewart’s life long interpretation of aging, or as Jessica Define writes in her Substack on May 1`9, 2023, “My general takeaway: It doesn't count as “celebrating an aging woman” if you're celebrating her for still looking young and fuckable.”

What struck me as most sad were the responses to Define’s article (a woman who has excoriated the media, the male dominated structure that messages and defines female standards, and the degree to which women have either allowed themselves to buy into or naively accept those absurd notions of beauty that so gravely impact women. This ‘enhancement’ is sold as beauty augmentation and lifestyle improvement, like a soldier who loses a leg in a war and can now receive the latest in prosthetics. One doesn’t have to lose a limb nowadays for this aesthetic refashioning. One only has to lose their soul… and possess an adequate bank account.

Martha Stewart as she wishes to display herself.

And, did I say impact women? How dare I. Men have not only gone along for the ride, but are at the helm. There is an adorable parlance describing this phenomenon: “When a man marries a woman, he wants her never to change. And, she does.” / “When a woman marries a man, she wants him to change. And, he doesn’t.” Sadly, I get this to be the case. Society accepts a man’s aging - sagging belly, wrinkles, disheveled, unkempt, rickety body and all. But, a women is expected to defy gravity. A male who attends to aging remains agile not pretty, is flexible not fawning, is healthy not harnessed. Contrarily, female health is associated with youthful appearance, unnatural attractiveness, keeping any show of aging at bay. Or, as Define insists, this is “ageism masquerading as age inclusivity.”

This is commercial phoniness, selling the idea that a woman near death should not only care about what other people think of her, but at all have in mind a desire to project any ambition to appear like a magazine idol or young swimsuit model under the pretense of making women feel better about getting older. The egotistical slobber is beyond belief. Really, how many women can afford (if they had any inclination in the first instance) the sheer quantity of injections and length of “scalpel-ing” (my word) and healing that goes along with the look of un-natural aging. Not to mention the extreme risks and consequences to all this surgery or implementations - appearance-related anxiety, depression, dysmorphia, disordered eating, self-harm, and worse.

And, what is natural looking about that? Or, as Matt Labash states in his reflection on the MS look, “And now, of course, Martha Stewart is doing the sexy grandma act, with her drooping décolletage and strategically placed upper-arms wrap, meant to cover the skin that slackens in us all as we age, part of nature’s cruel and inevitable process. I don’t like the Laws of Nature, either. But I didn’t write them, I just have to live by them. As do we all.” There is nothing self-empowering about resisting this inevitability.

Adele’s graying and my belly on full display in Santa Fe.

Then, she had the unmitigated gall to tell Variety Magazine in an interview that she has never had cosmetic surgery. But, whether true or not, who needs plastic surgery when technology can falsify every reality with Apps that can lift, shine, shape, tighten, and hide…oh hell, make you look exactly like Elle McPherson if that’s your desire. Who cares how you got to look fake when you look fake? Who cares that a piece of you is destroyed when you believe you are better for not being you? And, this is not to say that a man or woman cannot or should not pay attention to their aging process as a reflection of health and well being which can imbue a positive outlook, or provide personal pride in attire, and the like. But, who the hell and why would anyone want to emulate being a kid, a twenty something when no matter how you present yourself it is, in the end, an embarrasment.

A passage in the book Light Years by James Salter stands out, “The light was mild. A mole near her jaw had darkened. There was no question, she looked older, the age of one who is admired but not loved. She had made the pilgrimage through vanity, the pages of magazines, through envy itself to a vaster, more tranquil world. Like a traveler, there was much she could tell, there was much that could never be told. Young women liked to talk to her, to be in her presence. They were able to confess to her. She was at ease.” To be at ease is to be greatly admired.

I would be remiss if I pretended the mass of media messaging had not affected me. It had. Adele named it: Delilah. Delilah was everything from allowing myself to be distracted by other women, to feeling that Adele was not enough, or that she needed fixing, or someone else could fulfill me more or was more compatible. I don’t believe it was immaturity alone. My sense is that the pervasive and invasive nature of these ideas solely for advancing profit becomes societally absorptive. Repetition lends a banality to thought and blind acceptance. It is dangerous in that we lose how we are perceiving and treating ourselves in the process.

Aging, to me, is a gift. It is an astonishing and extraordinary experience I have come to accept. It has changed my relationship with my wife and with women. I used to think that despite my age I could be cool in the presence of young women. But, not only was that inauthentic, it was humiliating. I wasn't fooling anyone. My superiority routine, my success pretense, my semblance of sophistication and worldliness all were coverups. Charades of insecurity. Being myself has made me available to all the beautiful aspects of aging - greater acceptance, growing wisdom, the ability to express honestly my thoughts, a willingness to expose my heart. I view Adele through that prism. She is so much more to me now as I appreciate fully all that she means to me in her complexity. I have taken responsibility for the dance between us being made aware of the third entity in every relationship - the WE. The ineffably concrete presence that we are both accountable to.

And, yes, I still think Adele is lovely, attractive, has the softest skin to the touch…and looks great for her age. But, most importantly, she has been a devoted mother, an absolutely committed partner, and my friend. She is wise and smart. She is the person who I love doing absolutely nothing with. She is the person with whom I can say nothing to and communicate. She is the person who has no expectation any longer of who I am or could be. Thus, my desire is simply to sink more deeply into all aspects of her and our lives.

PANDEMIC DIARY

A HOME SO NEAR - SO FAR
March 17, 2022

Adele and I moved into our home in Jan. 1999. A middle class neighborhood, the house was modest and what we could afford at the time. I wanted more land, but my eyes were often grander than what I could put on the plate. And, with 8-year old Alexander in tow, Adele was wise in insisting we move to a neighborhood where there were other children. I acquiesced, needless to say, knowing she was right despite my public demonstrations of shoulder shrugs and frowning dismay. We do not have a large backyard, but to our advantage we are bordered on two sides by community buffer zones which requires twice the separation from one community to the adjacent community.

Nonetheless, just on the other side of our house is another in the Spring Valley community. In the summer when the trees and shrubbery are in full display there is a layer of green shielding that prevents us from seeing our neighbor. In winter, the opposite is true and we can see the comings and goings of the owners, now elderly and frail. The wife appears to be restricted to a wheel chair. The husband, Jim, is likely 90+ years old and is stooped over in parabolic curvature like the arc of a vaulting dolphin.

I first met Jim when we moved into the house. He was immediately cordial but, as well, demanded a level of familiarity I had no desire to reciprocate. I found it strange that our inaugural conversation began with Jim telling me his age. I stood there hardly knowing what to say. I mean anyone who is 70, 71, 72 years old and brings his age into the conversation clearly did not expect to live as long as he had. Each subsequent meeting, by the fence separating our properties, elicited a chronological update as if his still being alive was a miracle of miracles. Jim was never at a lack for words having three children and wanting to tell anybody who would listen where they are and what they are doing in great detail. These stories could go on for a half-hour or forty-five minutes without his asking about me or my family. However, I dutifully listened wanting not to appear averse to his chumminess.

I sense that Jim has been old even before he got old. I was listening to someone talking about some earlier time in his life as if hypnotized down to the glazing, far away stare. An ethereal memory for his historical catalogue. I think his past has always been crucial to his present. He had no life that I could see. That leaves you with remains. He and his wife were persistent homebodies. I can count on one hand the number of times I saw he and his wife going someplace other than Harris Teeter. And now, given their conditions, they go nowhere except when driven to the doctor.

There is full-time day care for Jim’s wife. Helpers are in and out, wheeling her outside to sit on their deck, helping Jim around the house, and other chores I prefer not to imagine. They certainly do not need my help. But, as a neighbor, one who stopped meeting Jim at the fence nearly two decades ago, I wonder if it would be nice one day to bring over a box of biscuits. Maybe I should call out to Jim when I see him on his deck. What do I say? “How y’a doing”? I can only imagine what the pair go through on an average day. What real relief do I have to offer? What words do I have to offer?

I am guessing there is some biblical reference I could source for an answer to my behavior. Probably Emily Post once wrote an advice column on the subject. Or, possibly, The Ethicist, from The New York Times could help. For the moment, I am happy for them satisfied that their needs are being met. That selfishly relieves me of any sense of responsibility…or guilt. But, I shouldn’t have to like my neighbors to be neighborly. Should I?

———————————————————-

I saw a really perfect, small movie last night with Adele. It is called “About Time”. The premise is absurd. And, yet… The protagonist is one of the Weasley brothers from Harry Potter, along with Rachel McAdams who is the apotheosis of sweetness and beauty, and Bill Nighy, who can do no wrong in my book. A sci-fi, fantasy romantic comedy whose charm is irresistible. And, whose message will make you tear and make you cheer. Catch it on Netflix.

LOVE